Bernie Kerik, former NYPD Commissioner and associate of Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, voiced his concerns about what he sees as a troubling turn of events in the legal proceedings against former President Donald Trump. Speaking on “Wake Up America,” Kerik suggested that the U.S. may be mirroring the actions of dictatorships by pursuing an indictment against a political opponent.
Kerik did not mince words, describing the situation as more than a mere “sad day.” He expressed worry that the country is veering toward a path often associated with Third-World nations and dictatorships, where political opponents are targeted through legal means. He called attention to what he perceived as a concerning trend and characterized it as “terrible.”
Kerik’s concern was particularly directed at Special Counsel Jack Smith and the office’s determination that the former president’s claims of widespread fraud and improprieties in the 2020 election were untrue. He disagreed with this assessment, basing his argument on the fact that during his collaboration with Rudy Giuliani’s team, they were engaged in active investigations into potential irregularities.
According to Kerik, these investigations involved collecting raw data from various states, gathering affidavits, and receiving information from multiple sources. He emphasized that the cumulative evidence led them to reasonably believe that there was probable cause to suspect substantial fraud and improprieties within several states.
Kerik revealed that he has provided both nonprivileged and now-privileged documents to support his claim. These documents, he asserted, substantiate the ongoing nature of the investigations and their findings. He noted that he and Giuliani briefed then-President Trump on a regular basis regarding their progress and the information they were uncovering.
While the former NYPD Commissioner acknowledged the gravity of the indictment against Trump, he reiterated his strong disagreement with the assertion that the former president’s claims lacked merit. Kerik’s assertions highlight the complex and contentious nature of the legal battle surrounding Trump and the allegations of election improprieties.
It remains to be seen how Kerik’s perspective will factor into the ongoing discourse surrounding the indictment and the broader implications it may have for the U.S. political landscape.
This article presents Bernie Kerik’s perspective on the Trump indictment and is not intended to provide legal analysis or opinion.